Asymmetric
current injection, with more current flowing in the distal
'blocking anode' could arrest APs at lower amplitudes, resulting
in decrease in the rectified, integrated EMG response.
The rectified, integrated EMG responses (excluding any anodic break response)
are shown in the figure as a function of the stimulus amplitude, from two different
experiments, on the left and right.
The proximal 'anode' was 8 mm from the 'cathode', and the distal 'anode' was
6 mm away. Rectangular pulses of 8 mS duration were applied. The maximum response
was determined with 100µsec square pulses. The balance refers to the fraction
of the total applied current that is flowing through the proximal 'anode'. The
EMG was recorded from the medial Gastrocnemius with bipolar intramuscular electrodes,
digitized and processed.
On the left, at zero balance( solid line, no current through the distal, 'blocking
anode') APs were not arrested. With increasing current in the distal ‘anode’,
EMG diminished and then disappeared. On the right, the direct response returns
at higher amplitudes from the 'virtual cathode' initiated APs. The experimental
results, shown in the figure, indicate that the current required to arrest APs
increases as a larger percent of the current is diverted to the escape anode.
These results also show that window between when arrest occurs and the virtual
cathode become sufficient to cause excitation increases as a greater proportion
of the anodic current is delivered to the escape anode.
Current Pulse Waveform
Monophasic
(above) and balanced biphasic (bottom) blocking current waveforms
applied to tripolar nerve cuff electrode. Total current divided
unequally between proximal and distal contacts ('anodes').
The central contact (the 'cathode') receives the opposite
current phase, negative stimulus pulse followed by positive
reversal current (if any). In the bottom figure, the reversal
current I_r shown exaggerated for clarity.
Suppression of Crossed
Extensor Reflex.
Force
developed in the Soleus muscle (Fs) by spinal reflex from
skin afferents on the other hind limb could be blocked by
pulse trains on the Soleus motor nerve(left side of figure).
In a decerebrate preparation, cutaneous stimulation of the
contra-lateral hind limb developed a background force in
the Soleus (S) and Medial Gastrocnemius (MG) muscles. Application
of a 2 second train of blocking pulses (3.0 mA, 0.5 mS plateau
phase, 0.7 mS decay time constant) to the nerve to the Soleus,
during this procedure, resulted in a 80% force reduction
at 20 Hz. (right top) and a 90% reduction at 30 Hz. (right
bottom)
Decerebration was done at the level of the superior colliculi. All nerve branches
of the Sciatic beyond the poplitial fossa, other than branches to the Soleus
and Medial gastrocnemius were severed. A blocking electrode was placed on the
Soleus nerve branch. Isometric forces were recorded from the two muscles.
van den Honert, C. and J. T. Mortimer (1981). “A technique for collision
block of peripheral nerve: frequency dependence.” IEEE Trans
Biomed Eng. 28(5): 379-82.